Contact form
Use the subject menu to route the message clearly. Please avoid sharing unnecessary sensitive information. For technical issues, page URLs and short reproduction steps are more helpful than long screenshots alone.
The AdeDX catalog keeps growing, which means the best improvements often come from real use: a tool that needs one more control, a page that needs better instructions, a broken link inside a related-tools block, a layout issue on mobile, or a missing utility that would save time in a repeated workflow. This page explains how to contact the site effectively so your message is easier to review and act on.
If you are reporting a problem, include the exact page URL and the action that caused it. If you are requesting a tool, describe the job you are trying to do rather than only naming a feature. Good messages save time because they reduce guesswork.
Use the subject menu to route the message clearly. Please avoid sharing unnecessary sensitive information. For technical issues, page URLs and short reproduction steps are more helpful than long screenshots alone.
A request like "please add an invoice generator" is a start, but it still leaves many questions open. A stronger request explains the exact input fields, the output format, what copy or export behavior matters, whether the page should support calculations or validation, and which related tools people would likely use after it. That level of detail helps determine whether the idea belongs as a simple helper, a more advanced calculator, or a different type of page entirely.
Tell us what the user enters into the page. Is it raw text, a list, numbers, dates, CSV rows, JSON, measurements, image uploads, or a few structured fields? Input design shapes the entire interface, so it is the first thing that needs clarity.
Describe what should come back. Should the output be one result, multiple metrics, a downloadable file, formatted text, code, a preview, or a reusable summary? Output expectations separate a real utility from a vague idea.
The strongest requests include the reason people would open the page. A clear use case helps prioritize features, write better copy, choose the right related tools, and avoid building something that looks fine but solves the wrong problem.
A short, clear reproduction note is often more valuable than a vague complaint. If a tool gives no output, loads the wrong section, breaks on mobile, shows a stale count, keeps a dead related link, or produces the wrong calculation, mention the exact sequence that triggered it. That allows the page to be retested without guessing.
Useful reports include wrong math output, stale metadata that does not match the page, a control that looks visible but does nothing, a broken copy or reset action, a hidden sidebar on mobile, overlapping cards, a "coming soon" fallback, dead links inside related-tools sections, or a page that still uses an outdated control style while the rest of the catalog has already moved on.
These details help keep the site review-ready and usable for both search visitors and repeat users.
If you need clarification about how browser-based processing works, what data a page may or may not send, or how advertising and analytics are handled, use the contact page and mention the exact page or policy section you are asking about. That makes it easier to answer with context rather than generic legal language.
Use this page for licensing, media, partnership, or operational questions too. Include who you are, what type of collaboration you have in mind, and whether the request is editorial, technical, commercial, or legal in nature.
Not every message needs to fit a strict category. If you have input on navigation, content quality, page clarity, broken expectations, or missing categories, that feedback is welcome as long as the message stays clear and specific.
The site has 900 tool pages, which means even a small naming difference can point to the wrong page if a report is vague. Before you send a message, take ten extra seconds to capture the exact slug, note whether the issue is visual or functional, and decide whether the problem happens every time or only with certain input. That extra clarity usually cuts multiple follow-up questions and makes it more likely the page can be checked in one pass.
A strong bug report is short but precise: "On /tools/binary-to-hex/, the copy button does nothing in Safari on iPhone after I convert 255. Expected the result to copy to clipboard." A strong tool request is just as specific: "Please build a sales tax comparison calculator that supports multiple rates, inclusive and exclusive pricing, and a copy-ready breakdown table." Clear messages let the review start with the actual task instead of guessing what the page was supposed to do.
The same rule applies to privacy or policy questions. Mention the exact page, script, or workflow you are asking about so the answer can stay practical rather than generic.
Yes. Composite tools are often useful when people repeatedly jump between pages just to finish one workflow. The more clearly you describe the sequence, the easier it is to judge whether the right solution is a new tool or a better set of related links and controls.
Screenshots help when the issue is visual, but they work best when paired with the page URL and a short explanation of what you clicked first. Without that context, a screenshot alone can be hard to reproduce.
No. Requests are judged by usefulness, clarity, overlap with existing pages, maintenance cost, and whether the job is better solved by a stronger version of an existing tool. Even when a request is not built exactly as submitted, it can still shape future page improvements.
Yes, but keep each issue organized. If several problems affect different pages, list them separately inside the message with one URL per line and a short note about each issue.
That is useful feedback. Mention whether the page has old button styling, layout drift, broken spacing, weak instructions, or missing actions so the review can focus on the exact problem rather than only the general impression.
Both work. The form is convenient for structured routing, while direct email can be easier when you already have a detailed note prepared. In both cases, clarity matters more than the channel.